Why The UK is “Banning” Right Wing Youtubers & Activists, Child Marriage in the US, and More…
Articles Blog

Why The UK is “Banning” Right Wing Youtubers & Activists, Child Marriage in the US, and More…

Sup You beautiful bastards hope yo’ure having a fantastic Monday welcome back to the Philip DeFranco show and let’s just jump into it and the first thing we’re gonna talk about today is This crackdown we’ve seen in the UK over this past weekend. You may have seen the headlines recently, like this one from The Daily Beast three far right-wing Figures were denied entry to the UK and three people they’re talking about are Brittany Pettibone Martin Sellner and Lauren Southern and this happened in two different instances. Sellner who was a leader in the Austrian identitarian movement. News reported he was on his way to speak of an Anti-immigrant event held at London speaker’s corner. But according to Pettibone’s paperwork They were denied entry to the UK on the basis that their visit would be a quote Both ended up being released on Sunday and the pair went back to Vienna Pettibone saying it felt like they were saying your right-wing That’s not allowed and then today we had a situation with Lauren’s southern Lauren tweeting out Investigated me under Schedule 7 terrorism act because of alleged Racism at least they let me identify as Pakistani on my report lol still being held by police later tweeting They locked me out and said our avoir officially banned from UK for racism doing fine though, all the cool People are being banned anyway. I need to gather my thoughts and call family interrogation story is pretty crazy Though, will tell soon. Later adding “I’m not kidding about this, but during my questioning by the UK police I was asked about my Christianity and whether I’m a radical I was also asked how I feel about running Muslims over with cars” and according to Lauren Southern’s paperwork She was denied entry due to an incident where she held up signs that said Allah is a gay God and so therefore her presence In the UK would be a quote “serious threat to the fundamental interests of society”. And as you’d expect this has stirred up a debate on is this the right thing to do people saying that this is extreme this Is the crackdown on freedom of speech but on the other side of you people saying no? This is the crackdown on hate speech people purposefully agitating and I will say personally and has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with what they have said in the past the idea that you are not allowing someone to the country based off of things they’ve said in the past that have been very critical of Islam and immigration, That’s crazy to me And it makes me think of the supposed reasoning behind the Laurens southern Allah is gay sign. Reportedly that was in response to a vice article that asked whether Jesus was gay Or not reportedly that experiment was conducted to see what kind of reaction this would get. And so if you flipped the situation and it was someone trying to get into the UK who is very anti Christianity who maybe also goes around saying anyone that once completely shot borders They’re a Nazi would that person be barred entry and also should that person be barred entry I think that whenever possible when we’re trying to think about a situation We flip it just to see how we would react. But with that said I want to pass a question off to you What are your thoughts on this story? good thing, bad thing? misplaced priorities for the UK or no? Let me know in those comments down below. Then because apparently someone over at Netflix was like Netflix isn’t quite addicting enough even though we literally have a feature on Netflix That’s like are you are you sure you’re still watching this show, and you didn’t just leave it running. No Netflix It was raining in LA on the weekend And I didn’t feel like going out onto the road and driving with a bunch of people that don’t understand precipitation That’s the excuse I’m using for being a garbage person today. And those changes that I was mentioning before my rant or actually test targeted at children. The new system essentially grants patches for watching certain shows. Some of the shows that were tested include fuller house Trolls, a series of unfortunate events and essentially it’s the attempt to gamify viewing experiences on Netflix for children And while this on its own is kind of interesting. I also wonder if people are going to call out the timing around this It’s a moved aimed at children obviously trying to increase watch times with children getting people into their system as they grow up But at the same time we’re seeing studies that are claiming that excessive viewing times of TV of tablets It’s actually harmful for children, and so I’m personally interested to see if this test becomes a new full-fledged feature Or if they end up pulling it back killing the program because of outrage that comes out. Personally I’m of the mindset that the responsibility falls on the parents But that might not fully matter in a move that seems so heavily targeted Specifically towards the children. And a quickie update to a story we covered last week Martin shkreli of course the farmer brawler we left off The judge said that Shelley was responsible for ten point four million dollars in losses and one of the main reasons that number would likely matter Is it could affect his sentencing which was Friday Crowley’s lawyers were trying to get less than two years? Prosecutors want 15 the judge kind of just split it down the middle and gave him seven years in prison. Also according to a vice Correspondent before he was sentenced Martin shkreli just started crying in the courtroom and also another point that that same writer pointed out It’s important remember that shkreli is serving seven years not Because he raised the price massively We’re talking five thousand percent of a drug that helps people live their lives saves their lives a disgusting Unforgivable thing that people in the pharmaceutical industry do on a regular basis But because he defrauded other rich people and now he has to pay the price And I’m not saying that she should not have face punishment for that But it is just very telling who gets prosecuted for what but from I want to share some stuff I loved today and today in awesome brought to you by post mate post mates of course a fantastic Delivery on-demand app you want something from the store or restaurant Open up the app boom they deliver it to your house your office your wherever but the hours I’ve been working lately it has become vital to my life so if you want to check it out go to post DeFranco com Download the app make sure you enter an offer code fill it D They will give you $100 in free delivery credit the first bit of Awesome is a trailer for sorry to bother you which looks like an Amazing movie, it stars a Keith Stanfield who I feel like is a really underrated actor I mean you’ve probably seen him in bits of selma doe snowden and then of course most recently get out and atlanta on FX who by the way is probably one of my favorite parts of that show a main point enjoy the trailer and get excited about july 6 Then we the slow mo guys doing paint blasts portrait and 4k nervous gave us tommy wiseau is joker Audition tape saturday night live it was a brand new black panther scene And if you want to see the full versions everything I just share the secret link of the day anything at all Links is always there in the description down below, and then let’s talk about the crashes in the news last night There was a helicopter crash in New York’s, East River The crash was caught on several cameras and while it appeared a light five Passengers ended up dying the only person that survived and was able to escape was the pilot while there’s currently an Investigation into this crash why did it happen? We’re also now starting to get information according to reports the pilot of that helicopter suggested a passengers gear somehow interfered with the helicopters operation We’ll have to wait to see if there’s more information that comes down But that was also not the only crash in the news a plane carrying 71 people crashed in Nepal today as a recording this video 49 people have been killed now as far as the reason for this crash the airline has blamed bad air traffic control but we also have authorities in Nepal saying that the plane made what they called an Unusual landing as far as why we’re getting this he said she set the Director General the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal said the aircraft Was permitted to land from the southern side of the runway, but it landed from the northern side but the airlines chief executive said there were wrong directions from the tower our pilot is not at fault one of the survivors of the crash also raised another red flag Saying that there seemed to be an issue before they even landed saying after a normal takeoff from Dhaka the plane had begun to behave Strangely adding all of a sudden the plane shook violently and there was a loud bang Afterwards what’s also interesting about this crash is it as the third commercial airlines crash to result in death in 2018 in fact it’s the third commercial airline crash in just the past 30 days this all of a sudden happening after a 20-17 where we saw zero deaths in this manner That’s where we are as of right now with of course some of the numbers potentially changing because some of those injured were in critical Condition and I’m not saying that it’s happening for any reason It just it really does stand out after a year of no deaths at least commercial airlines wise three and thirty days I don’t know And I’m let’s talk about the most recent wave of Twitter ban on Friday Twitter Smackdown multiple accounts that I’ve been accused of joke stealing some of the accounts affected Included girl post don’t worry common white girls so damn true and mean provider Here’s one example of a stolen tweet where they didn’t even change anything sometimes You’ll see them change a word or two, but then other times like this It is just blatant the crackdown isn’t actually a surprising move from Twitter the company has been very vocal recently about cracking down on spam and particular tweet deck a tweet deck if you don’t know is a Twitter app that lets users create groups of profile schedule pose post to Several accounts at once and suspended accounts like girl posts and so damn true people would steal Content like memes and jokes and then put it on a shared tweet Debt then the accounts in the tweet deck would band together and retweet each other’s stolen content to make it go viral this process was so successful brands actually paid Administrators for access to the collected content also known as decks and accounts in the tweet deck would sell their retweets to brands and people Who wanted to go viral so all of that said when we look at the big picture it doesn’t appear that this move from Twitter Is primarily focused on Twitter accounts that steal jokes this appears to be a part of Twitter’s? enforcement on spam in January Twitter announced they would be making changes to tweet that last month the company laid out those specific changes in a blog posts and one of the Most common spam violations we see is the use of multiple accounts in the Twitter developer platform to attempt to artificially amplify or inflate the prominence of certain tweets do not and do not allow your users to simultaneously perform actions such as likes retweets or followers from multiple accounts and then seemingly the most telling of what they were actually targeting they Say posting multiple updates on a single account or across multiple accounts you controlled with trending or popular topic for instance through the use of A specific hash tag with an intent to subvert or manipulate the topic or to artificially inflate the prominence of a hashtag or topic is Never allowed it seems like the war that’s actually taking place is against information manipulation we’ve seen stories in the past year about Trending topics that made their way there because of Russian BOTS one of the ways these BOTS and other bad actors work is very similar To what these joke stealers have been doing coordinated pushes to make the content? They are promoting go viral the main differences between the two of these groups obviously impact a general intent one is to make money the other is to at least cause chaos that said for me personally if some of the Accounts caught in the crossfire are just notorious joke stealers and fucking tastic there There is parallel thinking there’s sometimes accidentally saying something incredibly similar to another joke that someone made and then there is the unapologetic Stealing we see from many of these bad actors unfortunately, I believe that it’s just a matter of time until they bounce back in a different way or they thrive somewhere else, but any inconvenience whatsoever makes me happy and then let’s talk about lawmakers in Florida voting on a ban although it might not be the one that you’re thinking of Obviously the past few weeks. There’s been a lot of talk about guns and legislation around guns in Florida But what I’m talking about today is child marriage and for multiple reasons with this story I think it is important that we share Sheri Johnson’s stories Jerry johnson’s rapist was a church deacon who started attacking her when she was nine years old and by the time She was 10 she was pregnant with his child and reportedly when her church found out about the crimes They pressured the mother to have the daughter marry the man, which a judge approved at a time of this marriage She was 11 years old and he was 20 reportedly the abuse continued for years and during that time Johnson gave birth to five more kids before she escaped the marriage her child marriage happened 47 years ago But many children today can still legally get married and so Sheri has spent the last six years fighting to make sure no child Goes through what she did which then brings us to current law in Florida now currently in Florida if you’re sixteen or seventeen? Years old you can get married but you have to have the consent of both of your parents that is unless there is a pregnancy involved in which case there is no minimum age for marriage as long as a judge approves according to a front line analysis of child marriage in the United States more than 16,000 minors were married in Florida between 2000 and 2015 and a legislative staff analysis showed that between 2012 and 2016 over 1800 marriage licenses were issued in Florida to couples when at least one party was a minor this included a 13 year old 7 14 year olds and 29 15 year old there was even an example where a guy who is 90 years old? Was able to marry a 16 or 17 year olds that said on Friday sherry was hailed as a hero because the Florida Legislature passed a bill changing rules for child marriage state lawmakers have repeatedly cited sherry Johnson as an inspiration to change the law while there were some initial disagreements because the house wanted carve-outs for certain 16 and 17 year olds ultimately we Have a single bill a bill. That’s been approved by both, Florida House and Senate It is headed to the governor’s desk and it sets limits on the marriage of Seventeen-year-old pregnancy is no longer a factor and now anyone marrying a seventeen year old can’t be more than two years older and the child Would need parental consent, and it’s essentially a done deal Governor Rick Scott said that he will sign the bill what’s also interesting about the bill is that it was almost? Universally approved in the house was passed by a vote of 109 to 1 a single No vote came from Republican representative George Mariah well He didn’t say anything on the floor if we look about a month before to a quote that he gave it kind of gives some Insight at that time. He said I’m particularly focused on the pregnancy aspect of it I don’t want the message to be that it’s better to not get married So there was that now all of this said about, Florida it’s important to point out that this is also a Nationwide issue while 18 is typically the minimum age every state seems to have legal loopholes or exceptions allowing marriage at a younger age According to unchain at last a group campaigning to abolish child Marriage at least two hundred seven thousand four hundred sixty-eight minors were married in the United States between 2000 and 2015 in the last two years we’ve seen Virginia Texas, Kentucky, New York all voting to ban or limit child marriages But we’ve also seen other states struggle, New Hampshire was considering a bill to raise the minimum marriage age But that was killed after a recent push from a handful of Republicans in Tennessee House Republicans also killed a bill late last week that sought to ban child marriage But this also seemed to be part of a bigger thing attorney and former state senator David Fowler argued that it would hurt his effort To challenge the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage so therefore according to Fowler if the state were to move forward changing anything around marriage it would then Disqualify that they really thought that all marriages were nullified by the Supreme Court decision and ultimately while it would make a change here It would be self-defeating in the Supreme Court And this move was outrageous to a lot of people essentially you’re dealing with a situation where the argument for for not shutting down child Marriages is you’re not a fan of gay marriages considering the stories around child marriage that have been coming out of Tennessee it can be Infuriated front lines investigation found that Tennessee had the youngest married children in the country this Including ten-year-old girls who have been married to men between the ages of 24 to 31? we’ve also seen a story of an 11 year old boy who had been married to a 27 year old woman in Tennessee and then That brings us to Missouri whose current laws are the most lenient for child marriages has even been called a destination wedding spot for child marriages in some circles part of the reason for that is The only state that requires only the signature of one parent even if the other parent objects for ages of 15 16 and 17 years Old additionally like half of all states, Missouri has no minimum age to marry But it requires anyone 14 and under to get a judge’s approval which if you haven’t picked up on by this point I think is batshit crazy We’re talking about people who are in sexual relationships that are considered statutory rape and in some cases We’re seeing the children marry to protect the partners from prison I mean we’re talking about situations where from a legal standpoint It isn’t understood that this person is so young they cannot consent to sex but because there’s a baby or someone Approved a 10 year old marrying someone between the age of 24, and 31, it’s all good. That’s crazy It feels insane that we have to say there’s a law to stop this but based off of a lot of the reporting and stuff That we’ve found out over the years it needs to be done but outside That’s where I’m gonna end that story today and pass the question off to you. What are your that? What are your thoughts around this story? I know we have an international audience some some diverse thoughts, and so I’d love know what you think in those comments down below That’s where I’m going to end today’s show and remember if you liked this video you like what I’m trying to do on this channel That like but if you new here hit that subscribe button Also since YouTube’s notifications recently now are kind of like if we feel like it recommend following me on Twitter at Philly D I always link out when the new video is out. Oh, yeah, that said of course as always my name’s philip defranco You’ve just been phill’d in I love the old faces and I’ll see you tomorrow

100 thoughts on “Why The UK is “Banning” Right Wing Youtubers & Activists, Child Marriage in the US, and More…

  1. Lots to talk about today. Hope you're having a not so terrible Monday, ya Beautiful Bastards.
    Wanna jump around?
    Right-Wing Commentators Banned From the UK: (00:06), Netflix Gamifies Watching Shows For Kids: (2:26), Pharma Bro Sentenced: (3:34), More Flight Crashes This Year Than Last: (5:23),Twitter Cracking Down on Tweetdecking: (6:56), Child Marriage Laws Scrutinized: (9:24)

  2. So at this point, portraying allah in a light muslims don't like is seen as terrorism in the UK. Why not just admit you're an islamic republic now? lol

  3. So, if there's now child marriage in the U.S., does this make it alright for me to marry a child as an adult? How about babies. Can they marry each other? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  4. Hate speech is free speech, because when you give a government the right to restrict hate speech, you give them the right to restrict any speech.

  5. Jesus F. Christ, you'd think at least YOU would get it right. Pharma Bro did NOT raise the price of his drug for people who took his drug. He GAVE IT TO THEM FREE. How hard is that to understand? The price is ZERO out of pocket for patients.

    Either Pharma Bro gives it to them FREE, or their insurance pays.

    No person EVER pays for his drug.

    Beyond which, no one has to buy it from his company, anyway. Because actually it’s NOT his drug. The drug is NOT PATENTED. ANYONE CAN MAKE IT. Hospitals could make the drug themselves. IT IS NOT UNDER PATENT. But most hospitals only use one or two of these pills a year. So it is CHEAPER to buy it from Pharma Bro

    It is a STORY, put out the media. A story. But you're reacting as if it were true…

  6. There is a cultural difference between the UK and USA. I get that your right to be able to say whatever you want in the USA is sacred and can't be tampered with. But for us, we draw a line when it comes to deliberately stirring up tension hatred and violence. This doesn't mean that ideas can't be discussed, our TV program Question Time frequently has controversial speakers on, however it does mean that the UK border police were doing their job. This is a cultural difference that you might just not understand in the same way that we don't understand who you guys love guns so much and you don't understand why we love national health so much.

  7. Britain banned Louis Farrakhan, for decades, for his expressed racist anti Semitic-views. A whole load of people with extremist views, on all sides, have been banned from entering over the years. This kind of thing is not new and it's completely up to us who we do or don't let into the country. You don't have an automatic right to come here if you're not a citizen. Claiming 'free speech' is a nonsense excuse.

  8. You do not have a right to enter into any foreign state. Southern is a nativist and a part of her political philosophy is restricting immigration. For her to be angry when a foreign state like the United Kingdom exercise their right to deny entry to foreigners who they feel will endanger British values, is completely hypocritical and shows she does not care about principle.

  9. Phil, you did not research WHY Lauren Southern was banned. She was arrested in Italy for trying to prevent search and rescue boats from bringing in migrants. She's a very dangerous person. And I love the added irony of her complaining that the UK is keeping dangerous people out, when she is literally advocating for countries to keep dangerous people out (in her mind the only dangerous people are Evil Mooslims. So it's not good policy when they do it against her white ass- only brown people. Lmao)

    Lauren Sothern is a racist trouble maker. That's why she was banned. And I've noticed how these people, of Lauren's type, who are complaining about the treatment of white people in south Africa today were SILENT about the barbaric and vicous racist treatment of oppression towards black people yesterday when they enjoyed their white privilige during the days of apartheid.

  11. A judge can approve a marriage license if there's a pregnancy involved?

    So statutory rape or child molestation is perfectly OK, if the girl gets pregnant?

    And here I was, thinking the US couldn't get any more fucked up.

  12. I'm on the side of the UK government on this one.

    Bravo UK government for saying "Fuck you" to the three far-right activists who hate immigration into those rich, predominantly white countries. Or shall I be more specific in saying that they are against non-whites immigrating to those rich places.

    They preached against immigration into places like the UK for years now, and now they just got the "you can't come in" message from the UK.

    Good job UK government!

  13. I know I’m late In writing this. I respect a lot of what Phil has to say and finds he has a similar moral compass to myself however I don’t feel research was fully conducted on this topic.

    Muslim preachers who are deemed “radical” or “extreme” have been banned from the UK for several of years and were the first to be “picked” on and given the ban. Being a non radical Muslim, I believe soon are called for and some aren’t however this is life and law of the land. So to answer the question someone that is extreme against Christianity (or any other religion) yes! They are banned.

    This reminds me of another form of white privilege. Not until a white person is banned it makes headlines, even though this has been going on for many of years to non white people.

    So I think it’s only right that ALL extremist should be denied entry to the UK. Wither the conversation on should they be banned or not is another debate. On that same note, you can’t stop people listening to these radicals via the internet, social media etc so does it really matter.

    I also want to clarify “freedom of speech” does not exist in the uk. It is a US law and people watching too much American TV, think they have it. So you having an opinion and publicly stating it can have repercussions in the UK.

  14. I was appalled at the 3 day detention and subsequent banning of these people but equally appalled by the press coverage dismissing them as ¨Far Right Activists¨. Embarrassed and appealed at what my country has become.

  15. So those two ladies are a "serious threat to the fundamental interests of society", but the Pakistani Child Sex Slave Rings which operated for decades, one in Telford and one in Rotherham, each with over 1000 victims, isn't? Is that why the local authorities & police looked the other way in those two towns, because muslim criminals forcing thousands of children to get raped for money is not a serious threat?? Hmmmmm…

  16. [9:32] the reason being social mobility and human interaction, is it rape if everyone consents, is it your place to dictate what is and is not socially acceptable. the exception case in most states is because marriage is a state sanctified religious concept. the pregnancy exception is to provide for better human treatment of the children, that is why a judge has to approve, he has to determine if the act was truly an act of consensual consummation. that is the only way it is ethical or reasonable.

  17. You do realize that Shkreli gave the drug, free of charge, to those who could not afford it. Why do you never point this out?

  18. @2:05 – I think you hit it on the head when you said , "if anyone was anti-Christianity would they be barred from the UK."
    And we all know the answer to that. The answer is "no" of course. Its all part of the double standard hypocrisy that exists that every Christian knows about.
    Not saying that I agree with that Austrian guy. Southern has done some edgy stuff but she's pretty mainstream on most things.

  19. the child marriage is fine in my opinions, THE CHILD RAPE IS NOT. really how the hell does this offer ANY pause for these monster to go to jail.
    let love concur all… all but a lawful prison sentences.

  20. As an American Phil, you of all people should realise that rights extended to citizens, don't extend to foreigners (you know, like Guantanamo detainees). England doesn't have to let anyone into their country that they don't want to. It's a red herring to say their free speech is being abrogated. Like when people accuse corporations of censorship. It's not censorship, they just don't want to be associated with that person's message.

    Your American right to free speech isn't valid in the UK. And vice versa.

  21. typical american ignorant to the fact that his country is WAAAY ahead of any other country in terms of denying entry to people. How can you be "Against immigration" and yet be complaining that you've been "denied entry to another country". Hypocrite much?

  22. So Laura was considered a threat to the cultural interests of British society after being asked whether she's a radical christian, but radical imam's entering are fine? I dislike Laura and I don't care much for religion, but the last time I checked the Queen is still head of the christian church of England. Surely this is getting ridiculous. I'm guessing this is actually doing more harm than good for muslims, this has actually given a lot more weight to the argument that "muslims should be denied entry because their believes contradict British society".

  23. we are used to the US and our constitution, The UK is not the US and they are entitled to their own laws and the way they want their country run, or who they want in it, it's not up for other country's to decide, as for anti-freedom of speech again we are used to what the US allows, they may not have the same feeling about it, (example)someone in this country(us) wouldn't have been punished for the nazi dog(under the law) but the UK works differently, I don't agree with it, but I don't live there and it's not my say, and I DO NOT AGREE with child marrige, although 17 i'm split about, however, was there a culture map with these numbers, some of these could have been arranged marriges in some cultures, I don't find it right but those do happen, gypsy's are also married SUPER YOUNG (between 14-21) so I think that also really depends

  24. As much as I may find other peoples' views to be offensive at times, I would much rather they be allowed to put forth their views in an open and honest forum so I can decide for myself what I think and feel about them. There seems to be a prevailing sense these days that if we just "block" something, we can pretend it doesn't exist. If I meet someone who is a blatant racist, I would much rather know what they think straight out of the gate than have them sugar-coat it in some covert double-speak. The former makes it much easier and quicker to discern if this is someone I may not want to associate with rather than waiting for their views to slowly unravel. Deleting "hate speech" (and that definition varies depending on who you talk to) is different from deleting hatred. Hatred has been around as long as the human nature itself, and like it or not, it's something we humans are stuck with. The best we can do is confront it and try to overcome it, but hatred isn't something that can be wiped out with the click of a mouse. Treating a few symptoms might make us feel better temporarily. The problem lies in the delusion that we can instantly make a wound disappear simply by slapping a band-aid on it.

  25. Honestly I disagree with what Southern, Sellner and Pettibone think and promtote in terms of nationalism, race and culture but still I don't think banning people entrance to the UK or any other country is the best job to do, especially knowing that there are other people who promote also hate and violence and still they don't get punishment

  26. Flipping the situation is the best logical way to take your bias out of it, but you have to be honest with yourself

  27. I am so sorry. The UK is a fking joke these days. We have a mainstream political party which is part of the mass enablement of paedophilia against non muslim girls in 4 cities (and rising) 1400 in one city. 1000 in another and so on. But, hand out a vaguely balanced leaflet? I'm a christian! surely I would be offended right? I really dont care! If I am offended, it is irrelevant. I am offended because I need to think, an activity banned by default in society nowdays. Thinking is a hostile activity.

    Unlike many of those we let into the UK on a routine basis (that doesnt want to kill normal people) I just dont believe how far our incompetent border authorities have gone. They are literally a laughing stock. Even in every pub in the UK. They represent no one anymore and I think the Lauren Southern thing sealed the deal. It is like a joke in every pub. How utterly useless our border authorities are. We are flooded with extremist nutcases. But Lauren, No. Lauren should put on a Burka, declare herself a refugee from the religion of peace, throw away your documents and try to walk on in. Like every other lunatic or terrorist. Seriously? We have massive amounts of people here that want to blow us to pieces or try to recreate Mogidishu ( Sorry to pick on this particular degenerate Asylum, I like to be even handed) in London ffs?

  28. JFC how can anyone possibly support the Republican party?? That's absurd! Child marriages in 2018?? If I had read about the issues about the laws I would have just assumed it was about updating old laws on a slow day in Congress/the state capital.

  29. They're not keeping her out because she's a crazy extremist; they're keeping her out because the crazy extremists are already in.

  30. I agree with you it's called child molester those kids should not be getting married at those age the law should be 18 and over under 18 you need to go to prison so I agree with you they call child molesters and those parents didn't get a good ass whooping for doing that for lying there little 10 year old kids getting married they need to ass whooping.

  31. Its quite simple, and US citizens know this well, if you are not from that country (right or wrong) and you want to make statements about the constitution or people within that society you will be a target for deportation. You are a traveling guest, with no right to stay to that country, your rights are not limited to stay for any reason and can be stopped. Whether I agree with the message or the action is irrelevant, If you comment on the 2nd amendment in the US expect hostility, which if a foreigner, might prompt unwanted attention and get you deported. Only when you become a citizen can you start to tread the line, of insane hate speech laws in the UK that favours religious people.

  32. When I saw the news about child marriage part of me was thinking : « Good, we are evolving as a society ! » but I’m from France and my other thought was « How was that still legally allowed last year and before in the US ?!!! » 😱

  33. It’s not a crack down on free speech. Because we don’t have free speech in the UK you can’t publicly say anything racist, sexist, homophobic in public, with enough evidence you can also be in trouble for saying them in a work place or school

  34. Part of the idiotic Brexit Referendum was about the UK being unable to control our own borders. It turns out that we are perfectly able to control our own borders as the booting out of Southern proved perfectly.

  35. Since when is insulting people's constantly ok? Why does freedom of speech only count to malign and bully a whole group of people. It's obvious that they would like to get a rise out of people to push their own agenda

  36. These ultra right wings speakers and muslim radicals are two sides of the same coin, both incite fear and hatred.

  37. My uncle served in the European theater so that the Brits could do this?  Let the muslim  thugs have them, maybe the limey can save himself this time around!

  38. Freedom of speech doesn't give you authority to be a complete moron. Here in the UK we allow you to act like normal human being. The moment you start acting like a cretin we're going to step in and have a word. Wish people would stop acting like "freedom of speech" means you can say and do whatever the hell you like. Guess what… I have never been placed under arrest in a foreign country… Guess why? Because I keep my mouth shut. If I said everything I thought I would have been placed in a psychiatric ward many many moons ago.

  39. Y are you talking about russians bots, this is such bs, 0 evidence. Just someone makes a claim, then with time this claim is taken as fact.
    I saw the other day the president of my country being asked by some jew reporters. Over 26 nations agree they are Russian bots he said to the president! I was just thinking, Okay and now if he agrees with you, the next time you will say over 27 nations agree! This is all based on nothing.

  40. especially prevalent in such contentious times as these which we find ourselves in, where the world is riding on a wave of populism and right wing thinking. I don't agree with these decisions that were made though.

  41. There is no scientific or religious authority that says 18 or older is an adult. Any post-pubescent person is obviously ready for sex. Whether they are mentally ready for a relationship… well thats not determined by age at all.

  42. I'm South African and wish Lauren was banned from entering all of Africa. She is peddling lies about a white genocide happening in South Africa and that happened last year not that far in the past. So I think its good they are being banned

  43. 9:24, You mean to tell me people were pushing back gay marriage laws but allowing this bullshit to persist? WHAT?
    I didn't know this sort of thing even existed, and I'll bet those who did used it to the fullest extent to take advantage of the fucked up loophole. That's absolutely mind-boggling to me.

  44. Lauren Southern should not have been denied entry into the UK. They have literally abandoned the principle of free speech. So she criticises a religion… as a gay moderate Who has seen some of her videos and some of her interviews she is really not a hateful person… for a western country to deny her entry on the grounds that she is is crazy to me. Even if she was hateful, since she isn’t advocating for violence this shouldn’t have been an issue.

  45. My parents got married (by their choice) at ages 16 and 20, and they’re still happily married almost 25 years later. Personally, I think 16+ should be allowed to marry with parental consent, but younger than that is creepy to me. However, I do think that maybe there should be similar rules in place to prevent inappropriate marriages as there is to prevent green card marriages. Just a thought 🤷🏼‍♀️

  46. I really feel that this shit happening in the UK/the west will turn into a full blown hateful far right situation.
    Current people in power and the people that are supporting them (being silent is also supportive) are to blame. I hope for a civilized solution and open discussion which would lead to sane decisions, but it is not going to happen I think.

  47. Anti-immigration is hate speech imo. I am a Muslim living in Jordan, a stable country that shares borders with Syria. We had Jordanian Muslim people that were extreme anti-immigration when Syrian refugees started flooding in, and it was horrible and inhumane. Fortunately our society discarded these insecure f***s soon enough.
    People who are afraid about the cultural threats are being unreasonable, because cultures are already being influenced and changing rapidly during present times, and standing against weak people who escaped cruel conditions to protect your culture means you have messed up priorities.

    On the other hand, being anti-religion isn't necessarily hate speech. Lauren Southern should not have been banned IF the sole reason was insulting religion, or insulting Allah. Personally I think she's a moron but a moron who's entitled to her opinion nonetheless.
    But honestly I don't know if she just insulted religion or there were other actions or speeches that incited violence. More right wing is going extreme and their terrorism is expanding in an alarming rate.

  48. Shkreli cried in court? I'm sorry. I'm not a horrible person I swear but I wanna, no NEED to, see footage of that! The world is starting to crush me and everyone else and this piece of shit, whom I seriously believe is a sociopath, suddenly cries in court when HE is punished? I need evidence that golem has emotions, please! Plus, I think it would at least ease some pain for all of those people whose lives he has destroyed with that dickish price-hike move! Scumbag!

  49. So, I guess I have confusing thoughts on the Child Marriage laws which is blowing my mind. See, I got married at 17 and the only way I was able to do so was because I was pregnant because my Mom would not sign. She did not like my boyfriend. (there was a reason. he turned out to be an alcoholic sociopath) He was 4 yrs older than me. But not everyone's boyfriend is a sociopath.
    On the other hand, I was sexually molested by my own father for 3 yrs (from age 11 to 14) and then sexually molested and assaulted by others during my teen yrs. I cannot imagine being forced to marry one of these disgusting fuckers!
    I think that the Parkland, FL victims proved to us that 17 yr olds can be incredibly intelligent and mature, more so than adults in some cases! I would have no problem allowing them to marry within a range of 4-5 yrs above them if they passed a series of psychological interviews (or at least one) and showed that they are indeed in control of their own actions and they have the maturity to make that decision! And then have a judge give the final decision on it.

  50. Also what if someone has a relationship with someone in that country? Then what if they're banned and the other person doesn't have the means necessary to move.

  51. the home office banned other hate speakers like farrakhan so u cant say theyre not even handed or hypocrites although i dont agree with them it is fair

  52. UK became
    U – Uzbekistan
    K – Kazakhstan

  53. Let’s see why we are “banning” them, look at daily express and daily mail we have enough right wing shit being spread. Oh and left wingers aren’t the ones tarring races, religions or creeds for the actions of individuals or groups within.

  54. Liberalism is killing us just look at what they have done to President Trump the dark state , u.s media is guilty guilty guilty

  55. Hell I wish all right wing nuts where banned from US and congress because right wings are disgusting people.

  56. Hello dudes, t'inquiète on va y arriver. Les gouvernements sont tres pour 'I S'rael, > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5LMuRMrAwU

  57. Do they consider themselves "Far Right" at least?
    In "UK" the freemasonry Windsor Anglo-US-Zionist mafia rules and attack anyone exposing the New World Order Trilateral Establishment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top